|
|
जाकी रही भावना जैसी । प्रभु मुरत देखि तिन तैसी ।।
|
| Devotional Philoshopy |
|
| |
 In this web-site there are mentioned seven sutras to understand norms and values of human life. To implement these sutras in life sor to identify the meaning of the sutras one would get more support by this DEVOTIONAL PHILOSOPHY. The detailed explanation of this devotional philosophy is given in a book that is still unpublished. If anybody or any institution wants to publish this book then they can contact us. |
| |
| HERE IS GIVEN SOME OUTLINE OF DEVOTIONAL PHILOSOPHY |
| To get the proper understanding why human beings need to devout towards God, first of all we should be clear about why or why not ? In this regard we DECLARE here that the ultimate work of human being is -PROPER DEVOTION TOWARDS THE GOD |
| |
- According to Vedic devotional Philoshophy there are nine ways of devotion called "Navada Bhakti." . There are nice different example for each of these nine way of Bhakti as following. 1.Shrawan (Pariksyita), 2. Kirtan (Sukadeva), 3.Smaran (Pralada) 4. Padasewan (Laxmi), 5.Acrhan (Prithu), 6.Bandan (Akrur), 7.Dasya (Hanuman), 8. Sakya (Arjun) and 9.Aatmanibedan (Bali)
|
| |
| The main hurdle in the way of devotion is the piles of illusions or so called understanding deposited in our mind from the time immemorial, on the base of which we stand to look upon the things in the world. We think we know something, but in reality the truth is beyond the capacity of human mind. When one realizes this fact then he reaches to the state of devotion. So we suppose to clarify this topic by using both tools, the Mind and the Wisdom. Still the debate will continue to exist in the society forever .....! |
| |
| Let us look upon some of the debates going on in society today. What comes first? An egg or a hen? Since, it is an argument about material subject, its solution should be deduced according to scientifically proven logics; it is natural for human mind to think this way. Whatever sides have more logic to support, it is considered to be true. SO SOMETIMES THE EGG IS FIRST AND SOMETIME THE HEN. |
| |
| Similarly, which is first, energy or vibration? Many scholars have thought about it, and many will continue thinking over it. But no one can say that energy comes first or vibration comes first. From the very early time in nature, such questions are raised but the actual answer, without any contradiction, is still not possible, nor will it be in future. |
| |
· WHAT IS THE REASON BEHIND NOT HAVING ANY SOLUTION OF THIS SUBJECT WITH SUBJECT ? |
| |
| The last resort or the base for existence of every subject and object in universe is the subject without subject. When it is seen that every subject without subject is the mother of every other subjects, then it is natural that every subject in universe is controversial. It is so because the base of every subject is contradictory subject of first category. |
| |
| What is meant by first category of contradiction? Why it has indirectly played omnipresent role in the universe with no any apparent reason? To try to feel this subject less subject is the major duty of Sadhak (student). This is said as the element or the knowledge. Every scripture tries to disclose this mystery and every creature has tried from infinity to analyze this mystery by his own understanding but hardly is anyone satisfied. That, which is not encompassed in any definition, is the natural behavior of this contradictory subject. |
| |
- In above example, though an egg and a hen both are physical object, there is still contradiction that which is first?
|
| |
Since this is the contradiction of material level (second category), any scholar can attract the society by giving some strong logics on any one of the above. The society believes in this until it doesn’t find any logic stronger than it. So sometimes the logic support that the egg is first and sometimes the hen. So the series of logics and ideas continue eternally. |
| |
| Society cannot make a decisive conclusion on the subject of second category. Sadhak should understand the core of this situation of society without considering any logic. If that is not possible then also the Sadhak should stir the deep intellect and meditate on the situation before coming to a conclusion. |
| |
| This subject with subject cannot be understood by the use of logic and the nature of society to find its solution through the logic given by a scholar is fruitless because when another scholar comes with better logics then the truth established in the society can be turned upside down. Actually this contradictory character of second category is the ultimate subject of mystery that cannot be solved by science. Here the debate within different subjects is the reason for contradiction, but science cannot admit the contradictory character of subject. So again it proves that this debate doesn't lie in the working field of the science. |
| |
| It is already shown that since this is the contradictory subject of second category, it cannot be proved by science. But also the relative objective proofs and logic are thought to be necessary for understanding it because the society assumes to find its solution with relation to these logics, due to which the piles of assumptions are deposited in the understanding of society without finding any proper solution to the mystery. |
| |
| The one that has infinite manifestations and quality but is considered to be quality less and beyond qualities, the one that is omnipresent but is not seen anywhere, the one that does every activities but is considered to be non-doer, the one that has created this universe but is considered to be non-possessor, the one that is not relative of anybody but is considered to be in heart of everybody, the one that is overlooked by everybody but is considered to look after everybody, the one that is base of existence of universe but is considered independent, that one is the element of contradiction. Not only this much, it is the contradictory in contradiction. Not even this, it is everything but nothing. What is it? What is not it? It is no subject anymore! |
| |
| Meanwhile there is no any intention to get fame or prestige in the society by publishing this book. The only objective of this book is to solve the illusions that are prevailing in the present society and make peace in the society. It may help to uplift spiritual and mental situation of the individual. Let human civilization read it, contemplate over it and think about it. Then it can be their friend. This would be great thing for us. There are some shortcoming in the way of expression in this book. That is the expressions in this book are based on certain religious community but readers should take them in broad sense encompassing every existing religion and culture. Like we all know that the truth is one but we try to express it on the base of local language and situation. Due to this reality, one should not narrow the range of this thoughts because of some words used in it. Rather one should think over the thought behind the expression of the words used, how these thoughts can be beneficial to human community, one should think over it. |
| |
| This book is divided in mainly two parts. In the first part there is philosophical analysis about different aspects of human life while in the second part there is explained about the actual understanding of human life and the ultimate result of the human life. Saying it in one sentence, the second part is the ultimate target of human life and the first part is the seven arrows to aim the target. Today, man can read many books and it is yet another book that one can read, rest depends upon the thought of the reader. |
| |
| This philosophy doesn't want to challenge your current culture and religion but gives the suggestion to understand the norms and values of your culture and religion rightly. In this way you can do the right justice to yourself and liberate yourself. |
|
| |
|
